|
Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(27 Nov 2013 23:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
Per Bothner
(28 Nov 2013 03:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(28 Nov 2013 04:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(28 Nov 2013 04:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
Per Bothner
(28 Nov 2013 04:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(28 Nov 2013 04:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
Per Bothner
(07 Dec 2013 01:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(07 Dec 2013 19:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
Per Bothner
(08 Dec 2013 08:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial John Cowan (08 Dec 2013 17:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
Per Bothner
(08 Dec 2013 20:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial
John Cowan
(08 Dec 2013 23:23 UTC)
|
Re: Final comments, mostly editorial John Cowan 08 Dec 2013 17:13 UTC
Per Bothner scripsit: > I don't think it is possible to require warnings in a Scheme > specification. Yes, you're right, partly because the idea of warnings is not formalized as it is in CL. That's something I have to think about for R7RS-large. In that case I fall back on the position of making ]]> an error (which means, of course, that implementations are free to treat it how they like). -- You let them out again, Old Man Willow! John Cowan What you be a-thinking of? You should not be waking! xxxxxx@ccil.org Eat earth! Dig deep! Drink water! Go to sleep! Bombadil is talking. http://ccil.org/~cowan