Lexical syntax for boxes

Show/hide message thread

Lexical syntax for boxes Lassi Kortela (09 Nov 2022 16:34 UTC)

Re: Lexical syntax for boxes Marc Feeley (09 Nov 2022 16:40 UTC)

Re: Lexical syntax for boxes Lassi Kortela (09 Nov 2022 16:48 UTC)

Re: Lexical syntax for boxes Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (09 Nov 2022 16:41 UTC)

Re: Lexical syntax for boxes Lassi Kortela (09 Nov 2022 16:56 UTC)

Re: Lexical syntax for boxes Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (09 Nov 2022 17:04 UTC)

Re: Lexical syntax for boxes Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (09 Nov 2022 17:12 UTC)

Re: Lexical syntax for boxes Lassi Kortela (09 Nov 2022 17:42 UTC)

Re: Lexical syntax for boxes Marc Feeley (09 Nov 2022 17:24 UTC)

Re: Lexical syntax for boxes Lassi Kortela (09 Nov 2022 17:26 UTC)

Re: Lexical syntax for boxes Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (09 Nov 2022 17:32 UTC)

Re: Lexical syntax for boxes Lassi Kortela (09 Nov 2022 17:54 UTC)

Re: Lexical syntax for boxes Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (09 Nov 2022 18:55 UTC)

Lexical syntax for boxes Lassi Kortela 09 Nov 2022 16:34 UTC

 From the SRFI: "Racket, Gambit, SISC, Chez, and Chicken all support the
lexical syntax #&datum to create a literal box"

The current versions of Gambit, Chez, and Chicken raise a syntax error
on #&123

Racket works as advertised. I'm not able to test SISC.