|
Lexical syntax for boxes
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2022 16:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes Marc Feeley (09 Nov 2022 16:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2022 16:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Nov 2022 16:41 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2022 16:56 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Nov 2022 17:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Nov 2022 17:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2022 17:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Marc Feeley
(09 Nov 2022 17:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2022 17:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Nov 2022 17:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2022 17:54 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Nov 2022 18:55 UTC)
|
> On Nov 9, 2022, at 11:34 AM, Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io> wrote: > > From the SRFI: "Racket, Gambit, SISC, Chez, and Chicken all support the lexical syntax #&datum to create a literal box" > > The current versions of Gambit, Chez, and Chicken raise a syntax error on #&123 > > Racket works as advertised. I'm not able to test SISC. > > In Gambit, boxes are not self evaluating so you need to quote them: $ gsi Gambit v4.9.4-39-g9a887b80 > '#&123 #&123 Marc
