|
Lexical syntax for boxes
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2022 16:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Marc Feeley
(09 Nov 2022 16:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2022 16:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Nov 2022 16:41 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes Lassi Kortela (09 Nov 2022 16:56 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Nov 2022 17:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Nov 2022 17:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2022 17:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Marc Feeley
(09 Nov 2022 17:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2022 17:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Nov 2022 17:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Lassi Kortela
(09 Nov 2022 17:54 UTC)
|
|
Re: Lexical syntax for boxes
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(09 Nov 2022 18:55 UTC)
|
> No, at least not for Chez. > > (display '#&123) That works, too. I've updated <https://registry.scheme.org/#hash-syntax> and added the following note: "A quote ' next to an implementation's name means the syntax must be quoted in that implementation." The entry is now: #&... Box ['Chez, 'Gambit, Racket]
