Re: Improved error status John Cowan (12 Dec 2014 00:47 UTC)
Re: Improved error status John Cowan 12 Dec 2014 00:47 UTC
Takashi Kato scripsit:
> Yes, however R7RS even says an object satisfies `read-error?` or
> `file-error?` may or may not satisfy `error-object?`. So it would be
> nice to have this sentence so that if an implementation supports R6RS
> or SRFI-35 (which I believe `condition-type?` can be `error-object?`)
> may extend their the empty list queue error on top of their condition
Added and pushed to the staging area.
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan firstname.lastname@example.org
"The serene chaos that is Courage, and the phenomenon of Unopened
Consciousness have been known to the Great World eons longer than Extaboulism."
"Why is that?" the woman inquired.
"Because I just made that word up", the Master said wisely.
--Kehlog Albran, The Profit