capitalization convention feels non-Scheme-y Per Bothner (29 Jul 2015 16:18 UTC)
Re: capitalization convention feels non-Scheme-y John Cowan (29 Jul 2015 17:12 UTC)
Re: capitalization convention feels non-Scheme-y Bradley Lucier (29 Jul 2015 19:59 UTC)
Re: capitalization convention feels non-Scheme-y Bradley Lucier (31 Jul 2015 20:36 UTC)

Re: capitalization convention feels non-Scheme-y Bradley Lucier 31 Jul 2015 20:36 UTC

On 07/29/2015 12:18 PM, Per Bothner wrote:
> No other Scheme standard or SRFI (that I can think of) follows this
> capitalization
> convention.  It shouldn't matter whether Interval is a class or a
> builtin type:
> The names should be "interval", "internal?", "interval-dimensions", etc.

In

https://github.com/gambiteer/srfi-122

all procedure names are now lower case, and a pull request has geen
generated.

Brad