New names for some operations taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (13 Sep 2015 12:13 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations John Cowan (13 Sep 2015 19:01 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (13 Sep 2015 20:19 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations John Cowan (13 Sep 2015 22:20 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (14 Sep 2015 08:29 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations Shiro Kawai (13 Sep 2015 23:28 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations John Cowan (13 Sep 2015 23:45 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations Shiro Kawai (13 Sep 2015 19:27 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (13 Sep 2015 20:04 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations John Cowan (13 Sep 2015 20:11 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations Shiro Kawai (13 Sep 2015 20:25 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (13 Sep 2015 21:46 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (14 Sep 2015 09:39 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations Arthur A. Gleckler (13 Sep 2015 19:42 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (13 Sep 2015 19:57 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations Arthur A. Gleckler (14 Sep 2015 03:25 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations John Cowan (14 Sep 2015 03:38 UTC)

Re: New names for some operations John Cowan 13 Sep 2015 20:11 UTC

Shiro Kawai scripsit:

> "Reduce" has precedence in CL and some other languages but the usage
> seems a bit more liberal than "fold" - some allows omitting initial
> value, for example.

The difference between reduce and fold is that the seed value is
used only when the sequence being reduced is zero-length: it does
not participate in the "normal" operations.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
You escaped them by the will-death and the Way of the Black Wheel.
I could not.  --Great-Souled Sam