New names for some operations
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(13 Sep 2015 12:13 UTC)
|
Re: New names for some operations
John Cowan
(13 Sep 2015 19:01 UTC)
|
Re: New names for some operations
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(13 Sep 2015 20:19 UTC)
|
Re: New names for some operations
John Cowan
(13 Sep 2015 22:20 UTC)
|
Re: New names for some operations
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(14 Sep 2015 08:29 UTC)
|
Re: New names for some operations
Shiro Kawai
(13 Sep 2015 23:28 UTC)
|
Re: New names for some operations John Cowan (13 Sep 2015 23:45 UTC)
|
Re: New names for some operations
Shiro Kawai
(13 Sep 2015 19:27 UTC)
|
Re: New names for some operations
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(13 Sep 2015 20:04 UTC)
|
Re: New names for some operations
John Cowan
(13 Sep 2015 20:11 UTC)
|
Re: New names for some operations
Shiro Kawai
(13 Sep 2015 20:25 UTC)
|
Re: New names for some operations
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(13 Sep 2015 21:46 UTC)
|
Re: New names for some operations
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(14 Sep 2015 09:39 UTC)
|
Re: New names for some operations
Arthur A. Gleckler
(13 Sep 2015 19:42 UTC)
|
Re: New names for some operations
taylanbayirli@xxxxxx
(13 Sep 2015 19:57 UTC)
|
Re: New names for some operations
Arthur A. Gleckler
(14 Sep 2015 03:25 UTC)
|
Re: New names for some operations
John Cowan
(14 Sep 2015 03:38 UTC)
|
Shiro Kawai scripsit: > Go's map actually randomizes iterating order every time. It has a merit > that it tends to catch the code depending on the interation order early, > and it won't be surprising if some Scheme implementations adopt it. Chicken does that too now, but I don't know about any other Schemes. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan xxxxxx@ccil.org There is a Darwinian explanation for the refusal to accept Darwin. Given the very pessimistic conclusions about moral purpose to which his theory drives us, and given the importance of a sense of moral purpose in helping us cope with life, a refusal to believe Darwin's theory may have important survival value. --Ian Johnston