New names for some operations taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (13 Sep 2015 12:13 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations John Cowan (13 Sep 2015 19:01 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (13 Sep 2015 20:19 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations John Cowan (13 Sep 2015 22:20 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (14 Sep 2015 08:29 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations Shiro Kawai (13 Sep 2015 23:28 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations John Cowan (13 Sep 2015 23:45 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations Shiro Kawai (13 Sep 2015 19:27 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (13 Sep 2015 20:04 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations John Cowan (13 Sep 2015 20:11 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations Shiro Kawai (13 Sep 2015 20:25 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (13 Sep 2015 21:46 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (14 Sep 2015 09:39 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations Arthur A. Gleckler (13 Sep 2015 19:42 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (13 Sep 2015 19:57 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations Arthur A. Gleckler (14 Sep 2015 03:25 UTC)
Re: New names for some operations John Cowan (14 Sep 2015 03:38 UTC)

Re: New names for some operations John Cowan 13 Sep 2015 23:45 UTC

Shiro Kawai scripsit:

> Go's map actually randomizes iterating order every time.  It has a merit
> that it tends to catch the code depending on the interation order early,
> and it won't be surprising if some Scheme implementations adopt it.

Chicken does that too now, but I don't know about any other Schemes.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        xxxxxx@ccil.org
There is a Darwinian explanation for the refusal to accept Darwin.
Given the very pessimistic conclusions about moral purpose to which his
theory drives us, and given the importance of a sense of moral purpose
in helping us cope with life, a refusal to believe Darwin's theory may
have important survival value. --Ian Johnston