Re: Comments John Cowan 15 Feb 2016 01:03 UTC
Shiro Kawai scripsit: > Would it be better to note the fact? I've added this text: This procedure is intended only to extend default comparators into territory that would otherwise be undefined, not to override their existing behavior. In general, the ordering of calls to <code>comparator-register-default!</code> should be irrelevant. However, implementations that support inheritance of record types may wish to ensure that default comparators always check subtypes before supertypes. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan email@example.com Here lies the Christian, judge, and poet Peter, Who broke the laws of God and man and metre.