Re: Comments John Cowan 15 Feb 2016 01:03 UTC

Shiro Kawai scripsit:

> Would it be better to note the fact?

I've added this text:

This procedure is intended only to extend default comparators into
territory that would otherwise be undefined, not to override their
existing behavior.
In general, the ordering of calls to <code>comparator-register-default!</code>
should be irrelevant.  However, implementations that support inheritance
of record types may wish to ensure that default comparators always check
subtypes before supertypes.

John Cowan
Here lies the Christian, judge, and poet Peter,
Who broke the laws of God and man and metre.