is #f a valid index?
Duy Nguyen
(29 Jan 2020 12:23 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(02 Mar 2020 23:14 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(05 Apr 2020 22:45 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
John Cowan
(25 Jun 2020 21:20 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Alex Shinn
(25 Jun 2020 23:37 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
John Cowan
(25 Jun 2020 23:47 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Alex Shinn
(26 Jun 2020 00:23 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
John Cowan
(26 Jun 2020 01:00 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(25 Jun 2020 23:57 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Duy Nguyen
(29 Jun 2020 09:13 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(29 Jun 2020 14:39 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Duy Nguyen
(30 Jun 2020 08:59 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Alex Shinn
(30 Jun 2020 09:18 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index? Duy Nguyen (30 Jun 2020 09:25 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(30 Jun 2020 09:35 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Duy Nguyen
(30 Jun 2020 09:42 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(30 Jun 2020 09:47 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Duy Nguyen
(30 Jun 2020 09:52 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(30 Jun 2020 10:01 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Duy Nguyen
(30 Jun 2020 10:11 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Duy Nguyen
(30 Jun 2020 09:37 UTC)
|
Fwd: is #f a valid index?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(01 Jul 2020 20:22 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(14 Sep 2020 15:45 UTC)
|
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:18 PM Alex Shinn <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 5:59 PM Duy Nguyen <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> I think chibi does not follow the srfi here. The document for >> string-cursor->index says " If the argument is already an >> index/cursor, it is returned unchanged. ". So chibi should accept "1" >> and return it. But it throws an error instead. > > > Yes, I missed that. It seems strange. What's next, char->integer > should return its argument if passed an integer? I didn't write the srfi. But I guess we're not going that far. Accepting both indexes and cursors are just to make conversions between them easier. I do find this useful in the functions that take both indexes and cursors. When I need a cursor, I just run the input through string-index->cursor and I get a cursor. The alternative is check if it's an index first, then convert, which works but more code. -- Duy