is #f a valid index?
Duy Nguyen
(29 Jan 2020 12:23 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(02 Mar 2020 23:14 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(05 Apr 2020 22:45 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
John Cowan
(25 Jun 2020 21:20 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Alex Shinn
(25 Jun 2020 23:37 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
John Cowan
(25 Jun 2020 23:47 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Alex Shinn
(26 Jun 2020 00:23 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
John Cowan
(26 Jun 2020 01:00 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(25 Jun 2020 23:57 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Duy Nguyen
(29 Jun 2020 09:13 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(29 Jun 2020 14:39 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Duy Nguyen
(30 Jun 2020 08:59 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Alex Shinn
(30 Jun 2020 09:18 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Duy Nguyen
(30 Jun 2020 09:25 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(30 Jun 2020 09:35 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Duy Nguyen
(30 Jun 2020 09:42 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(30 Jun 2020 09:47 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index? Duy Nguyen (30 Jun 2020 09:52 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(30 Jun 2020 10:01 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Duy Nguyen
(30 Jun 2020 10:11 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Duy Nguyen
(30 Jun 2020 09:37 UTC)
|
Fwd: is #f a valid index?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(01 Jul 2020 20:22 UTC)
|
Re: is #f a valid index?
Arthur A. Gleckler
(14 Sep 2020 15:45 UTC)
|
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:47 PM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <xxxxxx@nieper-wisskirchen.de> wrote: > > Am Di., 30. Juni 2020 um 11:42 Uhr schrieb Duy Nguyen <xxxxxx@gmail.com>: > > > You could do it, you just need to box the index in a separate type. > > This is how it's done in Gauche, which stores byte offset most of the > > time (but with a separate tag, so it's distinct from integers) > > I meant a raw unboxed fixnum. I figured as much, but why would you want that? Index-as-fixnum is returned by plenty other functions, using fixnum for byte offset just opens more opportunity of using a fixnum for a wrong purpose. Plus byte offset is not useful in scheme anyway, you can't access any character with a byte offset unless you go through a horrible process of converting a string to u8vector or something. -- Duy