|
SRFI 130: 120 days
Arthur A. Gleckler
(01 Apr 2016 19:25 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 130: 120 days
John Cowan
(01 Apr 2016 20:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 130: 120 days
Alex Shinn
(02 Apr 2016 14:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 130: 120 days
John Cowan
(02 Apr 2016 16:29 UTC)
|
|
index/cursor merging [was: 120 days]
Per Bothner
(03 Apr 2016 19:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: index/cursor merging [was: 120 days]
John Cowan
(03 Apr 2016 19:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: index/cursor merging [was: 120 days]
Alex Shinn
(04 Apr 2016 01:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: index/cursor merging [was: 120 days]
Per Bothner
(04 Apr 2016 02:56 UTC)
|
|
Re: index/cursor merging [was: 120 days] Alex Shinn (04 Apr 2016 05:39 UTC)
|
Re: index/cursor merging [was: 120 days] Alex Shinn 04 Apr 2016 04:07 UTC
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Per Bothner <xxxxxx@bothner.com> wrote: > > For Kawa I'm focusing on generic sequence functions, including relatively > cheap substrings, so SRFI-130 isn't a priority. I'd really like to standardize basic string processing with cursors, since a large number of libraries depend on this, and using SRFI-13 imposes a performance penalty on many implementations. Specifically, for Snow packages most things I publish depend directly or indirectly on (chibi string), which cond-expands to use cursors for chibi and indexes for everything else. It would be preferable to standardize a basic cursor-oriented library. -- Alex