Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting

Show/hide message thread

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (07 Jun 2016 14:42 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting Pierpaolo Bernardi (07 Jun 2016 14:53 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting John Cowan (07 Jun 2016 16:11 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting William D Clinger (08 Jun 2016 02:22 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting Per Bothner (07 Jun 2016 15:48 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting Per Bothner (07 Jun 2016 17:37 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting John Cowan (07 Jun 2016 17:50 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting Per Bothner (07 Jun 2016 18:02 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting John Cowan (07 Jun 2016 18:19 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (07 Jun 2016 19:46 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting Per Bothner (07 Jun 2016 23:48 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting William D Clinger (08 Jun 2016 01:51 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting Per Bothner (08 Jun 2016 03:54 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting John Cowan (08 Jun 2016 14:15 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting Per Bothner (08 Jun 2016 15:35 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting John Cowan (08 Jun 2016 17:30 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting Per Bothner (08 Jun 2016 18:29 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting William D Clinger (09 Jun 2016 12:06 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting taylanbayirli@xxxxxx (08 Jun 2016 14:39 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting John Cowan (08 Jun 2016 15:13 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting Shiro Kawai (07 Jun 2016 16:37 UTC)

Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: R7RS-large discussion: Basic Types and Sorting Per Bothner 07 Jun 2016 17:36 UTC


On 06/07/2016 08:47 AM, Per Bothner wrote:
> In other words: Why can't we unify the concepts SRFI7 "immutable string"
> and SRFI-135 "text"?

That should have been: Why can't we unify the concepts R7RS "immutable string"
and SRFI-135 "text"?
--
	--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/