Re: SRFI 135, Immutable Texts: 90 days
William D Clinger 05 Sep 2016 12:57 UTC
Arthur A. Gleckler wrote:
> This is just a reminder that SRFI 135, Immutable Texts,
> reaches the end of its extended ninety-day discussion period
> today. (It was first published on 2016/6/6.) The
> discussion can go on, but in theory, the longest extension
> is supposed to be to ninety days.
>
> If there's anything I can do to help it along, please let me
> know.
No one has proposed any new changes to the most recent draft,
and there hasn't been any discussion of the draft itself since
then, so I think it's ready to become final.
Will