|
SRFI 144: more improvements to implementation
Arthur A. Gleckler
(20 Jun 2017 21:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 144: more improvements to implementation
Arthur A. Gleckler
(20 Jun 2017 21:53 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 144: more improvements to implementation
William D Clinger
(20 Jun 2017 23:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 144: more improvements to implementation
Arthur A. Gleckler
(21 Jun 2017 00:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 144: more improvements to implementation
John Cowan
(21 Jun 2017 01:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 144: more improvements to implementation
William D Clinger
(21 Jun 2017 21:01 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 144: more improvements to implementation
John Cowan
(21 Jun 2017 21:20 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 144: more improvements to implementation William D Clinger (21 Jun 2017 20:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 144: more improvements to implementation
Bradley Lucier
(21 Jun 2017 20:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 144: more improvements to implementation
Bradley Lucier
(21 Jun 2017 20:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 144: more improvements to implementation
William D Clinger
(21 Jun 2017 21:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 144: more improvements to implementation
John Cowan
(21 Jun 2017 21:22 UTC)
|
Arthur A. Gleckler wrote: > > By the way, I forgot to note that the portable sample implementation > > was designed to work in R6RS and R5RS with minimal changes. Indeed, I did > > most of the development in Larceny's R5RS mode, where it was convenient to > > have access to all of the un-exported help procedures, including those that > > ended up being commented out. > > Would you like to update the "README" file to mention that? I have done so in a new pull request. That pull request also fixes the brain fart spotted by Bradley Lucier. Will
