Re: SRFI 144: more improvements to implementation
William D Clinger 21 Jun 2017 20:32 UTC
Arthur A. Gleckler wrote:
> > By the way, I forgot to note that the portable sample implementation
> > was designed to work in R6RS and R5RS with minimal changes. Indeed, I did
> > most of the development in Larceny's R5RS mode, where it was convenient to
> > have access to all of the un-exported help procedures, including those that
> > ended up being commented out.
>
> Would you like to update the "README" file to mention that?
I have done so in a new pull request.
That pull request also fixes the brain fart spotted by Bradley Lucier.
Will