John,

On 2026-10-18 13:27 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> I bless these changes. I also think that in the large language the versions
> of these functions in (scheme base) should be divumented to follow this
> revision (i.e. both continuation-safe and allowing either strings or
> characters.

Thanks.  I’m confused, though.  In an email on the other thread you
seemed to request that these forms be reverted to SRFI 13 / R7RS-small.
Here you seem to be confirming the SRFI 152 extensions.  Which is it?

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>