On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 8:23 PM Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io> wrote:
> > Will do later. I'll need to see if I can find any scheme without
> > complex support and how to exclude those tests.
>
> It would be nice to have standard feature identifiers to detect things
> like complex numbers (as well as little-endian, 64-bit, full
> continuations, etc.) That would make it a little easier to write
> cond-expand's.

r7rs-small defines some, for example exact-complex. Maybe I'm just
missing something.
--
Duy