Re: A portable implementation for srfi-159
Duy Nguyen 15 Feb 2020 00:58 UTC
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 11:20 PM Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 4:39 AM Duy Nguyen <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't know, if people are interested (and with Alex's blessing) I
>> could open a pull request to merge this back to the srfi repository.
>> It may make it easier to have a reference implementation for srfi-166
>> too (not sure if that document is finalized yet)
>
>
> Thank you! That would be terrific.
With Sagittarius, Larceny passed and Gerbil mostly passed [1], I'm
pretty happy about it. Gave up on Guile, too much workaround their
r7rs library system.
> Since this is a sample implementation, not a change to the SRFI document,
> we can definitely include it in the SRFI 159 repo. As a courtesy to Alex,
> though, please check with him. But let me know even if you don't hear
> back in a week or so.
Alex, what do you think? To sum up if you're not subscribed, I took
(chibi show) out of chibi, cleaned it up to make it work with more
schemes and put it here
https://github.com/pclouds/srfi-159/tree/portable-implementation
the top commit should contain all the code modification because I
imported pristine (chibi show) before it.
> Please be sure to include a "README.*" file that puts your implementation in context.
Done. It's README.impl (because I wasn't sure if README.org should be
used for this)
[1] I opened an issue with Gerbil about numeric formatting. I suspect
this is Gerbil issue, not the implementation.
--
Duy