My druthers is to finalize srfi-164 as is, except for fixing the typos John reported.
I agree there is functionality that could be reasonably added (such as array-map),
but those can always be added in the future.  It is harder to change or remove
functionality, which argues for focusing on a small number of useful building blocks.

I also think before expanding the API, we should standardize on an API and/or syntax
for ranges.  It may also be useful to gain more experience with the "generalized
vector" concept.

So barring last-minute objections, I'll ask Arthur to finalize this thing tomorrow.
--
	--Per Bothner
xxxxxx@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/