|
Move-to-trash procedure
Lassi Kortela
(28 Aug 2019 17:56 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Move-to-trash procedure
John Cowan
(29 Aug 2019 01:14 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Move-to-trash procedure
Lassi Kortela
(29 Aug 2019 06:03 UTC)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
Re: Move-to-trash procedure
Lassi Kortela
(29 Aug 2019 14:51 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: Move-to-trash procedure
Arthur A. Gleckler
(29 Aug 2019 15:17 UTC)
|
||
|
SQLite SRFI
Lassi Kortela
(29 Aug 2019 06:08 UTC)
|
||
|
Mineral Lassi Kortela (29 Aug 2019 06:13 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: SQLite SRFI
John Cowan
(29 Aug 2019 14:15 UTC)
|
||
Mineral Lassi Kortela 29 Aug 2019 06:13 UTC
>> SQLite - The lite doesn’t refer to light, it refers to a “mineral”. <https://changelog.com/podcast/201> - I was confused by this, so I read the transcript. In case anyone else reads this, the name is supposed to be read as: SQL (S Q L or sequel, your call) - ite. So it does sound like the name of a mineral: bauxite, boehmite, hematite, etc. Heck, kryptonite :D > Jerod Santo: Hm, like a mineral. Were you playing on the word "light", or were you just playing on mineral...? > Richard Hipp: I was, I was. It's pronounced as a mineral. It's still a pun on "light". And an obvious one, given what SQLite is compared to other RDBMSes. [Source: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17766799]