Re: Proposed additional procedures for SRFI 205 from scsh, and licensing from that, including SRFI 170 Lassi Kortela 31 Jul 2020 15:48 UTC
All of those are good arguments and your diligence is admirable. However, in this case if we know that Olin wrote those parts of the manual, we should email him to ask whether he can approve dual-licensing them as MIT. Going by his past opinions, he ought to be horrified at the necessity for all these legal deliberations and would be amenable to doing it. They're practically the same license anyways.