Re: Proposed additional procedures for SRFI 205 from scsh, and licensing from that, including SRFI 170 Lassi Kortela 31 Jul 2020 15:48 UTC

All of those are good arguments and your diligence is admirable.

However, in this case if we know that Olin wrote those parts of the
manual, we should email him to ask whether he can approve dual-licensing
them as MIT. Going by his past opinions, he ought to be horrified at the
necessity for all these legal deliberations and would be amenable to
doing it. They're practically the same license anyways.