Email list hosting service & mailing list manager

Per-process vs per-thread current-directory once more Lassi Kortela (02 Aug 2020 19:36 UTC)
Re: Per-process vs per-thread current-directory once more Marc Nieper-Wi├čkirchen (03 Aug 2020 07:30 UTC)
Re: Per-process vs per-thread current-directory once more Lassi Kortela (03 Aug 2020 08:04 UTC)
Re: Per-process vs per-thread current-directory once more Marc Nieper-Wi├čkirchen (03 Aug 2020 12:12 UTC)
Re: Per-process vs per-thread current-directory once more Lassi Kortela (03 Aug 2020 12:20 UTC)
Re: Per-process vs per-thread current-directory once more Lassi Kortela (03 Aug 2020 08:08 UTC)
Re: Per-process vs per-thread current-directory once more Lassi Kortela (03 Aug 2020 08:17 UTC)
Re: Per-process vs per-thread current-directory once more Lassi Kortela (03 Aug 2020 08:25 UTC)

Per-process vs per-thread current-directory once more Lassi Kortela 02 Aug 2020 19:36 UTC

Did we reach a definite decision on per-process vs per-thread CWD? The
latest 170 draft seems written to suggest (but not very obviously) that
the CWD is always per-process.

I still think it would be clearer to use a per-thread CWD in Scheme
implementations where that is the custom. If current-directory is a
parameter object, it could be temporarily bound to #f to fall back to
the per-process OS CWD.