Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days hga@xxxxxx (04 Sep 2020 13:14 UTC)
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days Arthur A. Gleckler (04 Sep 2020 18:03 UTC)
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days Lassi Kortela (06 Sep 2020 12:19 UTC)
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (06 Sep 2020 12:25 UTC)
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days Lassi Kortela (06 Sep 2020 12:27 UTC)
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days Lassi Kortela (06 Sep 2020 12:30 UTC)
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days John Cowan (06 Sep 2020 16:40 UTC)

Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen 06 Sep 2020 12:25 UTC

That's great. In particular, for a SRFI like this one, which cannot be
implemented portably on top of R7RS (small), it is perfect when we
have a second implementation that may help to uncover any yet
undetected problems before finalization.

Am So., 6. Sept. 2020 um 14:19 Uhr schrieb Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io>:
>
> > Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help bring SRFI 170
> > to completion.  488 days ≫ 90 days.
>
> I just started a Gambit implementation of 170 for Unix and Windows. Will
> review and merge with Harold's Chibi implementation.