|
(Previous discussion continued)
|
||
|
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days
hga@xxxxxx
(04 Sep 2020 13:14 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days
Arthur A. Gleckler
(04 Sep 2020 18:03 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days
Lassi Kortela
(06 Sep 2020 12:19 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(06 Sep 2020 12:25 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days Lassi Kortela (06 Sep 2020 12:27 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days
Lassi Kortela
(06 Sep 2020 12:29 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days
John Cowan
(06 Sep 2020 16:40 UTC)
|
||
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days Lassi Kortela 06 Sep 2020 12:27 UTC
> That's great. In particular, for a SRFI like this one, which cannot be > implemented portably on top of R7RS (small), it is perfect when we > have a second implementation that may help to uncover any yet > undetected problems before finalization. Thanks. Anyone else wants to help write code or just to review it once it's written, help is welcome. Duncan Mak has a Kawa implementation going: <https://github.com/duncanmak/srfi-170>.