|
(Previous discussion continued)
|
||
|
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days
hga@xxxxxx
(04 Sep 2020 13:14 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days
Arthur A. Gleckler
(04 Sep 2020 18:03 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days
Lassi Kortela
(06 Sep 2020 12:19 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (06 Sep 2020 12:25 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days
Lassi Kortela
(06 Sep 2020 12:27 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days
Lassi Kortela
(06 Sep 2020 12:29 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days
John Cowan
(06 Sep 2020 16:40 UTC)
|
||
Re: SRFI 170, POSIX API: 480 days Marc Nieper-WiÃkirchen 06 Sep 2020 12:25 UTC
That's great. In particular, for a SRFI like this one, which cannot be implemented portably on top of R7RS (small), it is perfect when we have a second implementation that may help to uncover any yet undetected problems before finalization. Am So., 6. Sept. 2020 um 14:19 Uhr schrieb Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io>: > > > Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help bring SRFI 170 > > to completion. 488 days ≫ 90 days. > > I just started a Gambit implementation of 170 for Unix and Windows. Will > review and merge with Harold's Chibi implementation.