Last call for comments on SRFI 172: Two Safer Subsets of R7RS

Show/hide message thread

Last call for comments on SRFI 172: Two Safer Subsets of R7RS Arthur A. Gleckler (02 Sep 2019 04:28 UTC)

Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 172: Two Safer Subsets of R7RS Lassi Kortela (02 Sep 2019 07:37 UTC)

Evaluating definitions Lassi Kortela (02 Sep 2019 07:38 UTC)

Re: Evaluating definitions John Cowan (20 Oct 2019 22:11 UTC)

Re: Evaluating definitions Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (21 Oct 2019 06:37 UTC)

Re: Evaluating definitions John Cowan (21 Oct 2019 16:51 UTC)

Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 172: Two Safer Subsets of R7RS Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (02 Sep 2019 08:46 UTC)

Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 172: Two Safer Subsets of R7RS Lassi Kortela (02 Sep 2019 08:56 UTC)

Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 172: Two Safer Subsets of R7RS Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (02 Sep 2019 09:09 UTC)

Last call for comments on SRFI 172: Two Safer Subsets of R7RS Arthur A. Gleckler 02 Sep 2019 04:28 UTC

John Cowan, author of SRFI 172, Two
Safer Subsets of R7RS, has asked me to
announce "last call" for this SRFI.  He
believes that it is ready for
finalization, but would like to give
reviewers one last chance to submit
corrections and feedback before we
finalize it.

  <https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-172>

In particular, I appeal to anyone
reading this to try the sample
implementation, run the tests, and send
feedback about your results.

If you're interested in this SRFI,
please give your feedback via the SRFI
172 mailing list before 2019/9/10.
After that, assuming that no major
revisions are required, we will declare
it final.

Regards,

SRFI Editor