Last call for comments on SRFI 172: Two Safer Subsets of R7RS Arthur A. Gleckler (02 Sep 2019 04:28 UTC)
|
Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 172: Two Safer Subsets of R7RS
Lassi Kortela
(02 Sep 2019 07:37 UTC)
|
Evaluating definitions
Lassi Kortela
(02 Sep 2019 07:38 UTC)
|
Re: Evaluating definitions
John Cowan
(20 Oct 2019 22:11 UTC)
|
Re: Evaluating definitions
(no sender)
(21 Oct 2019 06:37 UTC)
|
Re: Evaluating definitions
John Cowan
(21 Oct 2019 16:51 UTC)
|
Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 172: Two Safer Subsets of R7RS
(no sender)
(02 Sep 2019 08:46 UTC)
|
Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 172: Two Safer Subsets of R7RS
Lassi Kortela
(02 Sep 2019 08:56 UTC)
|
Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 172: Two Safer Subsets of R7RS
(no sender)
(02 Sep 2019 09:09 UTC)
|
Last call for comments on SRFI 172: Two Safer Subsets of R7RS Arthur A. Gleckler 02 Sep 2019 04:28 UTC
John Cowan, author of SRFI 172, Two Safer Subsets of R7RS, has asked me to announce "last call" for this SRFI. He believes that it is ready for finalization, but would like to give reviewers one last chance to submit corrections and feedback before we finalize it. <https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-172> In particular, I appeal to anyone reading this to try the sample implementation, run the tests, and send feedback about your results. If you're interested in this SRFI, please give your feedback via the SRFI 172 mailing list before 2019/9/10. After that, assuming that no major revisions are required, we will declare it final. Regards, SRFI Editor