|
ASCII character classification
Lassi Kortela
(22 Nov 2019 13:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: ASCII character classification
John Cowan
(22 Nov 2019 14:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: ASCII character classification
Lassi Kortela
(22 Nov 2019 19:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: ASCII character classification
John Cowan
(22 Nov 2019 19:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: ASCII character classification
Lassi Kortela
(28 Nov 2019 13:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: ASCII character classification
John Cowan
(28 Nov 2019 14:41 UTC)
|
|
Should ASCII procedures accept non-ASCII characters?
Lassi Kortela
(28 Nov 2019 15:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: Should ASCII procedures accept non-ASCII characters?
Lassi Kortela
(28 Nov 2019 15:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: ASCII character classification Lassi Kortela (29 Nov 2019 01:08 UTC)
|
Re: ASCII character classification Lassi Kortela 29 Nov 2019 01:08 UTC
> I took it to be part of the definition of these functions (other than > ascii?) that it's an error to apply them to non-ASCII characters, but I > see that's not actually true. Perhaps it should be? Consider that > (number? 'foo) returns #f, but (even? 'foo) is an error. If we keep the ASCII predicates so that they accept non-ASCII characters and return #f for them, what's your opinion on having an `ascii-non-control?` procedure? I know it's a bit un-Scheme-like to have the negations but can't think of anything better. This ought to be the last open question pertaining to SRFI 175; as we settle this, I'll publish a draft and announce last call.