|
Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax
Lassi Kortela
(01 Nov 2019 19:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax
Marc Feeley
(01 Nov 2019 20:12 UTC)
|
|
The name of "keyword-call"
Lassi Kortela
(01 Nov 2019 20:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: The name of "keyword-call"
Lassi Kortela
(01 Nov 2019 20:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: The name of "keyword-call"
John Cowan
(01 Nov 2019 20:54 UTC)
|
|
Re: The name of "keyword-call"
Lassi Kortela
(01 Nov 2019 20:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: The name of "keyword-call"
John Cowan
(01 Nov 2019 21:30 UTC)
|
|
lambda*
Lassi Kortela
(01 Nov 2019 21:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: lambda*
John Cowan
(01 Nov 2019 21:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: lambda*
Lassi Kortela
(01 Nov 2019 21:59 UTC)
|
|
curry/partial
Lassi Kortela
(01 Nov 2019 22:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: curry/partial
John Cowan
(01 Nov 2019 22:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: The name of "keyword-call"
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(02 Nov 2019 16:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: The name of "keyword-call"
Lassi Kortela
(02 Nov 2019 23:16 UTC)
|
|
Re: The name of "keyword-call"
hga@xxxxxx
(01 Nov 2019 21:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax
Per Bothner
(01 Nov 2019 20:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax
Lassi Kortela
(01 Nov 2019 21:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(02 Nov 2019 16:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(02 Nov 2019 16:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax
John Cowan
(02 Nov 2019 16:48 UTC)
|
|
Re: Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(02 Nov 2019 16:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax
Lassi Kortela
(02 Nov 2019 23:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax
Lassi Kortela
(02 Nov 2019 23:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax
John Cowan
(03 Nov 2019 02:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(03 Nov 2019 08:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax
Lassi Kortela
(03 Nov 2019 09:56 UTC)
|
|
Re: Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(03 Nov 2019 10:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax
Lassi Kortela
(03 Nov 2019 11:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(03 Nov 2019 11:31 UTC)
|
|
Re: Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax
Lassi Kortela
(03 Nov 2019 12:41 UTC)
|
|
Re: Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(03 Nov 2019 15:20 UTC)
|
|
Re: Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax
Lassi Kortela
(03 Nov 2019 15:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax Lassi Kortela (03 Nov 2019 15:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: Quick vote about portable keyword argument syntax
John Cowan
(03 Nov 2019 19:39 UTC)
|
> Since 177 macros > (the proposed option 2) work equally well with keyword objects as :foo > or foo: symbols, any call/kw expression using R7RS-large keyword objects > would also be a valid 177 call/kw expression. Well, R7RS-large syntax using :foo as an identifier would have to be translated to (values :foo) if converting call/kw expressions to 177 syntax. But that would be a very rare case, and the cleanliness of the standard would be preserved.
