Reawakening keywords
John Cowan
(23 Apr 2020 21:16 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Alex Shinn
(23 Apr 2020 22:51 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
John Cowan
(23 Apr 2020 23:35 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Alex Shinn
(24 Apr 2020 00:04 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
John Cowan
(24 Apr 2020 00:45 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(24 Apr 2020 06:15 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Lassi Kortela
(24 Apr 2020 06:44 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(24 Apr 2020 06:46 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Lassi Kortela
(24 Apr 2020 06:52 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(24 Apr 2020 07:10 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Lassi Kortela
(24 Apr 2020 07:27 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(24 Apr 2020 07:43 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Lassi Kortela
(24 Apr 2020 08:00 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(24 Apr 2020 08:26 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords Lassi Kortela (24 Apr 2020 08:34 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Amirouche Boubekki
(24 Apr 2020 06:54 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Lassi Kortela
(24 Apr 2020 07:04 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(24 Apr 2020 07:13 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Lassi Kortela
(24 Apr 2020 07:36 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Lassi Kortela
(24 Apr 2020 06:39 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Arthur A. Gleckler
(24 Apr 2020 15:07 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
John Cowan
(25 Apr 2020 00:07 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Arthur A. Gleckler
(25 Apr 2020 00:12 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(25 Apr 2020 07:51 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
John Cowan
(25 Apr 2020 16:04 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(25 Apr 2020 16:40 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
John Cowan
(25 Apr 2020 18:10 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(25 Apr 2020 18:25 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
John Cowan
(25 Apr 2020 22:02 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(02 May 2020 19:33 UTC)
|
Re: Reawakening keywords
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(24 Apr 2020 06:10 UTC)
|
> no `call/kw' prefix and using symbols to introduce optional arguments (so > that they essentially appear as a plist). Apart from the syntax, this > is equivalent to CL-style. You're right. It has the exact same advantages and problems as CL. > This solves the caller-side of the problem, which is the most visible > side. For the callee-side, there can be different ways like > `lambda/kw', `define/kw' and `let-keywords'. And hygienic keywords can be accomplished by: (let ((my-keyword something-unique-imported-from-a-library)) (some-procedure-taking-keywords pos1 pos2 pos3 my-keyword my-value))