Re: Last call for comments on SRFI 188: Splicing binding constructs for syntactic keywords Marc Nieper-WiÃkirchen
27 May 2020 12:55 UTC
Am Mi., 27. Mai 2020 um 14:37 Uhr schrieb Lassi Kortela <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> Can you add a note to the rationale about the fact that the splicing
> versions are not a drop-in replacement for the standard non-splicing
> ones and hence they need to have different names?
I can add a sentence that the splicing forms cannot be a drop-in
replacement for the non-splicing forms, only that the non-splicing
forms can be defined in terms of the splicing forms.