> That was faster than I expected!  I'm going to be away (camping) until
> Wednesday afternoon, leaving soon, so I'm not going to have a chance to
> set it up until Wednesday afternoon.

No problem, we can collect error set IDs this thread until then.

Thanks a lot for your continued diligence with SRFI and hope you have a
refreshing trip :)

> To preserve our naming convention, how about schememessages,
> schemenames, schemeidentifiers, schemeids, schemelocales,
> schemelocalization, schemel12n, or the like?

These are nice suggestions. My vote goes to schemeids (or the even
shorter schemeid) since it can be extended to cover other kinds of
identifiers as well. (Personally, I'd like us to start collecting
"official" Scheme implementation identifiers since those are useful in
many places.)

Another suggestion: schemeregistry - but does that sound too dry and
bureaucratic? Maybe it does, and is no clearer than schemeid(s).