schemeregistry is right in the "Subject:" line!

While it's indeed dry and bureaucratic, it's very, if not
*perfectly* descriptive for registering the existence, and
basic characteristics any sort of Scheme artifact below
the levels that are already being handled like Scheme
standards and SRFIs.

- Harold

----- Original message -----
From: Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io>
Date: Monday, July 27, 2020 3:03 PM

[good stuff]

Another suggestion: schemeregistry - but does that sound too dry and
bureaucratic? Maybe it does, and is no clearer than schemeid(s).