SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry hga@xxxxxx (30 Aug 2020 12:37 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry Lassi Kortela (30 Aug 2020 14:01 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry hga@xxxxxx (30 Aug 2020 14:25 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry Lassi Kortela (30 Aug 2020 14:52 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry hga@xxxxxx (30 Aug 2020 15:45 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry Lassi Kortela (30 Aug 2020 16:06 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry John Cowan (30 Aug 2020 14:55 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry Lassi Kortela (30 Aug 2020 15:22 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry John Cowan (30 Aug 2020 16:05 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry Lassi Kortela (30 Aug 2020 16:39 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry Lassi Kortela (30 Aug 2020 16:56 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry hga@xxxxxx (30 Aug 2020 20:13 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry hga@xxxxxx (30 Aug 2020 15:23 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry Lassi Kortela (30 Aug 2020 15:35 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry Lassi Kortela (30 Aug 2020 15:44 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Aug 2020 16:02 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry Lassi Kortela (30 Aug 2020 17:05 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry John Cowan (30 Aug 2020 17:47 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry John Cowan (30 Aug 2020 18:56 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry Lassi Kortela (30 Aug 2020 18:59 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Aug 2020 19:45 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry hga@xxxxxx (30 Aug 2020 17:34 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry John Cowan (30 Aug 2020 17:55 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry Arthur A. Gleckler (30 Aug 2020 18:27 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry Lassi Kortela (30 Aug 2020 18:57 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry Arthur A. Gleckler (30 Aug 2020 19:10 UTC)
Don't panic Lassi Kortela (30 Aug 2020 19:28 UTC)
Re: Don't panic Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (30 Aug 2020 19:34 UTC)
Re: Don't panic Arthur A. Gleckler (30 Aug 2020 20:00 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry Lassi Kortela (30 Aug 2020 19:57 UTC)
Re: SRFI 198 and the Schemeregistry John Cowan (30 Aug 2020 20:09 UTC)

Don't panic Lassi Kortela 30 Aug 2020 19:28 UTC

> You're probably not caught up yet, but is that the hill *you* want to
> die on, as opposed to (conventions (sqlstate postgresql))?

So each of the three of us is obviously right, and is frustrated that
the other two want to die on some hills for some reason :) Each thinks
our problems would be so easily solved if the other two simply agreed
with one's take on everything.

I'm confident we can still get the SRFI finalized without three dead
people on hills.