Am So., 30. Aug. 2020 um 21:28 Uhr schrieb Lassi Kortela <xxxxxx@lassi.io>:

> I'm confident we can still get the SRFI finalized without three dead
> people on hills.

I wouldn't want the other outcome! ;)

Anyway, if I get it right, SRFI 198 was started to support SRFI 170.
SRFI 170, however, seems to be self-contained even without SRFI 198
(apart from the reference). So could it make sense to set SRFI 198
aside for some time until more potential applications come? In the
end, we can hope that the applications dictate the necessities and the
problem SRFI 198 really wants to solve.

Marc