The sre index doesn't list auxiliary syntax, just symbols.

So more like 4.2.8 in R7RS. Or see "Auxiliary Syntax" in SRFI 148, for example.

Am Do., 23. Juli 2020 um 20:07 Uhr schrieb Felix Thibault
<xxxxxx@gmail.com>:
>
> So, something more like the procedure and and sre indices after the rationale in srfi-115? https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-115/srfi-115.html#Rationale and the notation should be about ... | and | or | not | set! | = | @ | quote | quasiquote ? I am just looking for a model to give me an idea of how the specification of the exported bindings should look.
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 9:17 AM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <xxxxxx@nieper-wisskirchen.de> wrote:
>>
>> SRFI 204 has to define the identifiers "..1", "?", etc. as auxiliary
>> syntax and the implementing library has to export them. Therefore, a
>> consolidated list of exported identifiers would be very helpful.
>>
>> Furthermore, SRFI 204 should specify that the exported binding of
>> "..." is the same as the exported binding of "..." from the standard
>> library, etc.
>>
>> Marc
>>
>> Am Do., 23. Juli 2020 um 14:42 Uhr schrieb Felix Thibault
>> <xxxxxx@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > Sorry, this was re:
>> >>
>> >> I think a consolidated list of exports including all the auxiliary
>> >>
>> >> syntax identifiers is still missing.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 7:53 AM Felix Thibault <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Are talking about something like this:
>> >> https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-1/srfi-1.html#ProcedureIndex
>> >>
>> >> but including both the patterns and match & co.?