Email list hosting service & mailing list manager

SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Arthur A. Gleckler (21 Apr 2021 15:00 UTC)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (21 Apr 2021 15:12 UTC)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Arthur A. Gleckler (21 Apr 2021 15:17 UTC)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Arthur A. Gleckler (21 Apr 2021 15:20 UTC)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (21 Apr 2021 15:24 UTC)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Felix Thibault (21 Apr 2021 18:51 UTC)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Felix Thibault (02 Jul 2021 06:55 UTC)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Arthur A. Gleckler (07 Jul 2021 01:11 UTC)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Felix Thibault (09 Jul 2021 06:45 UTC)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (21 Apr 2021 19:08 UTC)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Amirouche Boubekki (30 May 2021 16:04 UTC)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Arthur A. Gleckler (09 Jun 2021 21:28 UTC)

Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Felix Thibault 02 Jul 2021 06:55 UTC

I pushed what I have and included in the commit message documentation
about which tests are failing and that I think the problem is mostly
with the ooo/quasi-syntax macros -this is the area where I would
really need help to make the var syntax work. Otherwise I can take
that syntax out. Either way, if I had a more concrete idea about how
to make the specification clearer for people who wanted to implement
it from scratch, I could work on that.

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 11:45 PM Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 6:04 PM Felix Thibault <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I will have one last go at fixing the later-binding branch tonight and
>> get back with you tomorrow.
>
>
> Thank you!