Email list hosting service & mailing list manager

SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Arthur A. Gleckler (21 Apr 2021 15:00 UTC)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (21 Apr 2021 15:12 UTC)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Arthur A. Gleckler (21 Apr 2021 15:17 UTC)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Arthur A. Gleckler (21 Apr 2021 15:20 UTC)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (21 Apr 2021 15:24 UTC)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Felix Thibault (21 Apr 2021 18:51 UTC)
(missing)
(missing)
(missing)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Felix Thibault (02 Jul 2021 06:55 UTC)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Arthur A. Gleckler (07 Jul 2021 01:11 UTC)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Felix Thibault (09 Jul 2021 06:45 UTC)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (21 Apr 2021 19:08 UTC)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Amirouche Boubekki (30 May 2021 16:04 UTC)
Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Arthur A. Gleckler (09 Jun 2021 21:28 UTC)

Re: SRFI 204: 300 days. Will anyone volunteer to take over? Felix Thibault 09 Jul 2021 06:45 UTC

There is a PR in now that has my first attempt at the Syntax and
Semantics rewrite. At the beginning of next week I will be back to go
over it and the edits I need to make.
Thanks
Felix

On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 9:11 PM Arthur A. Gleckler <xxxxxx@speechcode.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 11:55 PM Felix Thibault <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I pushed what I have and included in the commit message documentation
>> about which tests are failing and that I think the problem is mostly
>> with the ooo/quasi-syntax macros -this is the area where I would
>> really need help to make the var syntax work. Otherwise I can take
>> that syntax out. Either way, if I had a more concrete idea about how
>> to make the specification clearer for people who wanted to implement
>> it from scratch, I could work on that.
>
>
> Whenever you're ready to publish a new draft, please let me know.  You can send me a pull request or a patch.
>
> Thanks!