> (bytevector 1 2 3) is a standard procedure in R6RS and R7RS. Is John > planning a convenience procedure with the same name that is more > lenient > about the types of arguments it can handle? > > Just so, with some other helpful procedures. The almost-SRFI is at > <http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/johnwcowan/r7rs-work/blob/master/srfi-2xx.html> > and Wolfgang's implementation is at > <https://github.com/Zipheir/bytestrings>. Your procedure is named `bytestring` so you are keeping the semantics of the RnRS `bytevector` procedure intact. That's good. `bytestring` is a welcome addition to the language. The spec seems exactly right to me. (Tangentially related: I have a "Symbols as strings" pre-SRFI that has a similar procedure to make a symbol by concatenating assorted things.)
