Re: New draft (#3) of SRFI 207: String-notated bytevectors Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen 12 Sep 2020 19:55 UTC

Thanks for your work on this!

May I ask for the inclusion of utf8"..." already in this SRFI? This
way, most of what we argued about is moot because it is clear that
u8"..." must be something different than usual strings UTF8-encoded
when utf8"..." is provided as well. The grammar for utf8"..." is even
simpler because one can reuse the grammar for Scheme strings.

Marc

Am Mi., 9. Sept. 2020 um 18:52 Uhr schrieb Arthur A. Gleckler
<xxxxxx@speechcode.com>:
>
> I've just published draft #3 of SRFI 207. It was submitted by Daphne Preston-Kendal, author of the SRFI.
>
> Here are Daphne's comments on the draft:
>
> procedure library and a minor correction to the description of the notation
>
> Here is the commit summary:
>
> merge in John Cowan’s proposed procedure library (implementation to come)
> make the definition of the notation match the formal syntax
> correct the credits and rationale
> "reference impl." => "sample impl."
> Follow US Copyright Office recommendations.
> Publish third draft.
>
> Here's the diff:
>
> https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-207/compare/draft-2..draft-3
>
> Regards,
>
>
> SRFI Editor