Re: New draft (#4) and last call for comments on SRFI 210: Procedures and Syntax for Multiple Values
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe 19 Jan 2021 19:17 UTC
On 2021-01-18 09:58 +0100, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen wrote:
> I'd like to have SRFI 210 finalized soon. The only remaining issue is the
> naming/argument order of "compose", which should be compatible with prior
> work but should also be in line with SRFI 189.
My 0.02$ on the color of the bikeshed:
I prefer `chain'. It's short and descriptive. Alternatively, I'd
accept `xcompose'; the `x-' convention, while not exactly elegant,
is well-established from SRFI 1's `xcons'.
Thanks for all of your work on trying to get this finalized.
--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>
"Quantum mechanics can be understood as the discovery that information
in nature is always finite." --Carlo Rovelli