Re: New draft (#4) and last call for comments on SRFI 210: Procedures and Syntax for Multiple Values Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe 19 Jan 2021 19:17 UTC
On 2021-01-18 09:58 +0100, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen wrote: > I'd like to have SRFI 210 finalized soon. The only remaining issue is the > naming/argument order of "compose", which should be compatible with prior > work but should also be in line with SRFI 189. My 0.02$ on the color of the bikeshed: I prefer `chain'. It's short and descriptive. Alternatively, I'd accept `xcompose'; the `x-' convention, while not exactly elegant, is well-established from SRFI 1's `xcons'. Thanks for all of your work on trying to get this finalized. -- Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz> "Quantum mechanics can be understood as the discovery that information in nature is always finite." --Carlo Rovelli