Email list hosting service & mailing list manager

New draft (#2) and last call for comments on SRFI 217: Integer Sets Arthur A. Gleckler (31 Jan 2021 05:39 UTC)
Re: New draft (#2) and last call for comments on SRFI 217: Integer Sets Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (31 Jan 2021 08:58 UTC)
Re: New draft (#2) and last call for comments on SRFI 217: Integer Sets Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (31 Jan 2021 19:18 UTC)
Re: New draft (#2) and last call for comments on SRFI 217: Integer Sets Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (03 Feb 2021 00:12 UTC)
Re: New draft (#2) and last call for comments on SRFI 217: Integer Sets Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (03 Feb 2021 06:58 UTC)
Re: New draft (#2) and last call for comments on SRFI 217: Integer Sets Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe (03 Feb 2021 07:25 UTC)
Re: New draft (#2) and last call for comments on SRFI 217: Integer Sets Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (03 Feb 2021 07:30 UTC)

Re: New draft (#2) and last call for comments on SRFI 217: Integer Sets Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe 03 Feb 2021 00:12 UTC

On 2021-01-31 14:18 -0500, Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote:
> On 2021-01-31 09:27 -0800, Arthur A. Gleckler wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 12:58 AM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <
> > xxxxxx@nieper-wisskirchen.de> wrote:
> >
> > > What happened to the XXX-search issue? I think the discussion about it is
> > > still going on, isn't it?

We've decide to leave the iset-search specification as-is; that is,
new integers can be passed to the `update' continuation.  This
corresponds to the (d) option in John's list of possible solutions
(in https://srfi-email.schemers.org/srfi-217/msg/15730984/).  So no
changes to existing SRFIs providing `search' forms should be
necessary.

Hopefully this resolves the issue.

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>

"The art of doing mathematics consists in finding that special case
which contains all the germs of generality." --David Hilbert