|
semantics and portability
Marc Feeley
(09 Mar 2001 17:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability
sperber@xxxxxx
(09 Mar 2001 18:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability
Per Bothner
(09 Mar 2001 19:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability
sperber@xxxxxx
(10 Mar 2001 08:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability
Marc Feeley
(09 Mar 2001 19:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability
sperber@xxxxxx
(10 Mar 2001 08:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx (20 Mar 2001 10:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability
Marc Feeley
(20 Mar 2001 12:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability
sperber@xxxxxx
(20 Mar 2001 12:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability
Marc Feeley
(20 Mar 2001 14:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability
sperber@xxxxxx
(20 Mar 2001 16:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability
Marc Feeley
(20 Mar 2001 16:55 UTC)
|
Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx 20 Mar 2001 10:37 UTC
>>>>> "Marc" == Marc Feeley <xxxxxx@IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes: Marc> No. All I am saying is that the process started to run the underlying Marc> interpreter should have the same (shell) environment as the one of Marc> "scheme-script". After rereading this, I'm still not sure I get it. "scheme-script" *is* the underlying interpreter, no? -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla