Re: semantics and portability

semantics and portability Marc Feeley (09 Mar 2001 17:55 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx (09 Mar 2001 18:04 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability Per Bothner (09 Mar 2001 19:09 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx (10 Mar 2001 08:44 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability Marc Feeley (09 Mar 2001 19:57 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx (10 Mar 2001 08:52 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx (20 Mar 2001 10:37 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability Marc Feeley (20 Mar 2001 12:35 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx (20 Mar 2001 12:52 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability Marc Feeley (20 Mar 2001 14:49 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx (20 Mar 2001 16:35 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability Marc Feeley (20 Mar 2001 16:55 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx 20 Mar 2001 10:37 UTC

>>>>> "Marc" == Marc Feeley <xxxxxx@IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes:

Marc> No.  All I am saying is that the process started to run the underlying
Marc> interpreter should have the same (shell) environment as the one of
Marc> "scheme-script".

After rereading this, I'm still not sure I get it.  "scheme-script"
*is* the underlying interpreter, no?

--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, VÃ¶lkerverstÃ¤ndigung und Ã¼berhaupt blabla