Re: semantics and portability

semantics and portability Marc Feeley (09 Mar 2001 17:55 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx (09 Mar 2001 18:04 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability Per Bothner (09 Mar 2001 19:09 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx (10 Mar 2001 08:44 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability Marc Feeley (09 Mar 2001 19:57 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx (10 Mar 2001 08:52 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx (20 Mar 2001 10:37 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability Marc Feeley (20 Mar 2001 12:35 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx (20 Mar 2001 12:52 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability Marc Feeley (20 Mar 2001 14:49 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx (20 Mar 2001 16:35 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability Marc Feeley (20 Mar 2001 16:55 UTC)

Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx 20 Mar 2001 16:35 UTC

>>>>> "Marc" == Marc Feeley <xxxxxx@IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes:

Marc> By the way, I feel SRFI 22 is the right place to introduce a "getenv"
Marc> procedure, because SRFI 22 clearly is about the interaction between a
Marc> Scheme program and its invocation from the shell, and also it has
Marc> a definite UNIX bias.

I can see your point.  Should we then also include "exit"?

--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, VÃ¶lkerverstÃ¤ndigung und Ã¼berhaupt blabla