|
semantics and portability
Marc Feeley
(09 Mar 2001 17:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability
sperber@xxxxxx
(09 Mar 2001 18:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability
Per Bothner
(09 Mar 2001 19:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability
sperber@xxxxxx
(10 Mar 2001 08:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability
Marc Feeley
(09 Mar 2001 19:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability
sperber@xxxxxx
(10 Mar 2001 08:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability
sperber@xxxxxx
(20 Mar 2001 10:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability
Marc Feeley
(20 Mar 2001 12:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability
sperber@xxxxxx
(20 Mar 2001 12:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability
Marc Feeley
(20 Mar 2001 14:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx (20 Mar 2001 16:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: semantics and portability
Marc Feeley
(20 Mar 2001 16:55 UTC)
|
Re: semantics and portability sperber@xxxxxx 20 Mar 2001 16:35 UTC
>>>>> "Marc" == Marc Feeley <xxxxxx@IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes: Marc> By the way, I feel SRFI 22 is the right place to introduce a "getenv" Marc> procedure, because SRFI 22 clearly is about the interaction between a Marc> Scheme program and its invocation from the shell, and also it has Marc> a definite UNIX bias. I can see your point. Should we then also include "exit"? -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla