Re: fxmapping-unfold(-maybe)
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe 14 Jun 2021 05:50 UTC
On 2021-06-13 20:18 -0400, Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote:
> For fxmapping-map-either, I considered
> fxmapping-fork-map, which at least is less confusing than split-map
> or partition-map.
"fxmapping-partition-map" is now making a lot more sense to me, since
fxmapping-partition is a special case of this function:
(fxmapping-partition p fxmap)
≡
(fxmapping-partition-map (lambda (v ins-left ins-right)
(if (p v) (ins-left v) (ins-right v)))
fxmap)
--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>
"When are lurking loop instructions struck from structural inductions?"
--Conor McBride