Re: SRFI 228 final read-through | Simplelists

SRFI 228 final read-through Arthur A. Gleckler (10 Dec 2022 18:44 UTC)

Re: SRFI 228 final read-through Daphne Preston-Kendal (10 Dec 2022 18:49 UTC)

Re: SRFI 228 final read-through Arthur A. Gleckler (10 Dec 2022 18:55 UTC)

Re: SRFI 228 final read-through Lassi Kortela (10 Dec 2022 20:43 UTC)

Re: SRFI 228 final read-through Lassi Kortela (10 Dec 2022 20:46 UTC)

Re: SRFI 228 final read-through Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (10 Dec 2022 20:49 UTC)

Re: SRFI 228 final read-through Lassi Kortela (10 Dec 2022 20:56 UTC)

Re: SRFI 228 final read-through Daphne Preston-Kendal (10 Dec 2022 20:57 UTC)

Re: SRFI 228 final read-through Lassi Kortela (10 Dec 2022 21:46 UTC)

Re: SRFI 228 final read-through Daphne Preston-Kendal (10 Dec 2022 22:09 UTC)

Re: SRFI 228 final read-through Lassi Kortela (10 Dec 2022 22:27 UTC)

Re: SRFI 228 final read-through John Cowan (10 Dec 2022 21:29 UTC)

Re: SRFI 228 final read-through Arthur A. Gleckler (10 Dec 2022 22:03 UTC)

Re: SRFI 228 final read-through Daphne Preston-Kendal (10 Dec 2022 22:12 UTC)

Re: SRFI 228 final read-through Arthur A. Gleckler (11 Dec 2022 02:54 UTC)

Re: SRFI 228 final read-through Lassi Kortela 10 Dec 2022 20:46 UTC

NB: "rather than being in a separate library" is especially ambiguous;
does it suggest that if and when the procedures ship in some other
library, the (srfi 228) library should be retroactively removed from the
relevant Scheme implementations?