> I am the author of this SRFI and would prefer that the mailing list for this SRFI remain on-topic: discussing matters specifically related to this SRFI.

Your wish is my command.

> I’m well aware of the objections you’ve made elsewhere. I don’t agree with them, but I also don’t object to you discussing them in forums such as scheme-reports-wg2 and srfi-discuss where more general procedural questions are more relevant.

I've done what I can.