|
SRFI 228 final read-through
Arthur A. Gleckler
(10 Dec 2022 18:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 228 final read-through
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(10 Dec 2022 18:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 228 final read-through
Arthur A. Gleckler
(10 Dec 2022 18:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 228 final read-through
Lassi Kortela
(10 Dec 2022 20:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 228 final read-through
Lassi Kortela
(10 Dec 2022 20:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 228 final read-through
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
(10 Dec 2022 20:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 228 final read-through
Lassi Kortela
(10 Dec 2022 20:56 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 228 final read-through
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(10 Dec 2022 20:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 228 final read-through
Lassi Kortela
(10 Dec 2022 21:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 228 final read-through
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(10 Dec 2022 22:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 228 final read-through Lassi Kortela (10 Dec 2022 22:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 228 final read-through
John Cowan
(10 Dec 2022 21:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 228 final read-through
Arthur A. Gleckler
(10 Dec 2022 22:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 228 final read-through
Daphne Preston-Kendal
(10 Dec 2022 22:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: SRFI 228 final read-through
Arthur A. Gleckler
(11 Dec 2022 02:54 UTC)
|
> I am the author of this SRFI and would prefer that the mailing list for this SRFI remain on-topic: discussing matters specifically related to this SRFI. Your wish is my command. > I’m well aware of the objections you’ve made elsewhere. I don’t agree with them, but I also don’t object to you discussing them in forums such as scheme-reports-wg2 and srfi-discuss where more general procedural questions are more relevant. I've done what I can.
