On 2022-01-18 13:28 -0500, Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote:
> I've argued that
> the only sensible thing here is application, so it's not a big deal:
> lambda* is essentially defined such that it simply never returns a nullary
> procedure.

Oops, I overlooked the direct "lambda-compat" support for nullary
procedures, which is clearly what John was referring to.  I agree
that this should be removed so that what I wrote above can, in fact,
be the truth.

--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe  <xxxxxx@sigwinch.xyz>