SRFI 238: Codesets Arthur A. Gleckler (03 Nov 2022 22:10 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets John Cowan (04 Nov 2022 02:01 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets Arthur A. Gleckler (04 Nov 2022 02:22 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets John Cowan (04 Nov 2022 03:03 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets Arthur A. Gleckler (04 Nov 2022 03:38 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets John Cowan (04 Nov 2022 03:55 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets John Cowan (04 Nov 2022 04:03 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets Arthur A. Gleckler (04 Nov 2022 04:06 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets Lassi Kortela (04 Nov 2022 07:01 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets Lassi Kortela (04 Nov 2022 07:04 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen (04 Nov 2022 07:01 UTC)
Re: SRFI 238: Codesets Lassi Kortela (04 Nov 2022 12:52 UTC)

Re: SRFI 238: Codesets Arthur A. Gleckler 04 Nov 2022 03:37 UTC

John Cowan <xxxxxx@ccil.org> writes:

| What's the "right" mapping here?  All
| these mappings are equally good, which
| is why Posix talks in terms of names
| with unpredictable numerical
| equivalents mapped in the
| system-specific errno.h file.

Can't the implementation then use that
errno.h file to generate a correct
codeset?